Market Failure And Role Of Government Pdf
File Name: market failure and role of government .zip
- Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy
- Market Failure and the Role of Government
- Market Failure and the Role of Government
What do we want from our government? One answer is that we want a great deal more than we did several decades ago. In the current century, that share has more than tripled.
Market Failures, Equity and Government. The important thing for Government is not to do things which individuals are doing already, and to do a little better or worse; but to do those things which at present are not done at all. I n Chapter 1, we saw that government has four main economic functions. These are establishing a legal infrastructure that enables markets to work, resource allocation functions when there are market failures, provision of social welfare including a fair distribution of income, and macroeconomic management. As we have seen, an efficient market economy requires a complete set of competitive markets and fully informed buyers and sellers.
Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy
What do we want from our government? One answer is that we want a great deal more than we did several decades ago. In the current century, that share has more than tripled. Total government spending per capita, adjusted for inflation, has increased more than six fold since Figure All levels of government are included.
Government expenditures include all spending by government agencies. Government revenues include all funds received by government agencies. The primary component of government revenues is taxes; revenue also includes miscellaneous receipts from fees, fines, and other sources.
We will look at types of government revenues and expenditures later in this chapter. Government expenditures and revenues have risen dramatically as a percentage of GDP, the most widely used measure of economic activity. Source: U.
Government purchases happen when a government agency purchases or produces a good or a service. We measure government purchases to suggest the opportunity cost of government. Whether a government agency purchases a good or service or produces it, factors of production are being used for public sector, rather than private sector, activities. Spending for public education is another example. Government expenditures and purchases are not equal because much government spending is not for the purchase of goods and services.
The primary source of the gap is transfer payments , payments made by government agencies to individuals in the form of grants rather than in return for labor or other services.
Transfer payments represent government expenditures but not government purchases. Governments engage in transfer payments in order to redistribute income from one group to another. The various welfare programs for low-income people are examples of transfer payments.
Social Security is the largest transfer payment program in the United States. This program transfers income from people who are working by taxing their pay to people who have retired. Interest payments on government debt, which are also a form of expenditure, are another example of an expenditure that is not counted as a government purchase.
Several points about Figure Note first the path of government purchases. Government purchases relative to GDP rose dramatically during World War II, then dropped back to about their prewar level almost immediately afterward.
Government purchases rose again, though less sharply, during the Korean War. This time, however, they did not drop back very far after the war. A second development, the widening gap between expenditures and purchases, has occurred since the s. This reflects the growth of federal transfer programs, principally Social Security, programs to help people pay for health-care costs, and aid to low-income people. We will discuss these programs later in this chapter.
Finally, note the relationship between expenditures and receipts. Prior to , revenues roughly matched expenditures for the public sector as a whole, except during World War II. But expenditures remained consistently higher than revenues between and The federal government generated very large deficits during this period, deficits that exceeded surpluses that typically occur at the state and local levels of government. The largest increases in spending came from Social Security and increased health-care spending at the federal level.
Efforts by the federal government to reduce and ultimately eliminate its deficit, together with surpluses among state and local governments, put the combined budget for the public sector in surplus beginning in As of , the Congressional Budget Office was predicting that increased federal revenues produced by a growing economy would continue to produce budget surpluses well into the twenty-first century.
That rather rosy forecast was set aside after September 11, Terrorist attacks on the United States and later on several other countries led to sharp and sustained increases in federal spending for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as expenditures for Homeland Security.
The administration of George W. Bush proposed, and Congress approved, a tax cut. The combination of increased spending on the abovementioned items and others, as well as tax cuts, produced substantial deficits.
The evidence presented in Figure In addition to governments that spend more, people in the United States have clearly chosen governments that do more.
The scope of regulatory activity conducted by governments at all levels, for example, has risen sharply in the last several decades. Regulations designed to prevent discrimination, to protect consumers, and to protect the environment are all part of the response to a rising demand for public services, as are federal programs in health care and education. In the United States, most revenues came from personal income taxes and from payroll taxes.
Most expenditures were for transfer payments to individuals. Interest payments on the national debt and grants by the federal government to state and local governments were the other major expenditures. The situation in the European Union differs primarily by the fact that a greater share of revenue comes from taxes on production and imports and substantially less is spent on defense.
The four panels show the sources of government revenues and the shares of expenditures on various activities for all levels of government in the United States and the European Union in Capital taxes refer to taxes levied at irregular and infrequent intervals on the value of assets, or net worth owned, or transferred in the form of legacies or gifts.
Social contributions cover actual amounts receivable from employers and employees. To understand the role of government, it will be useful to distinguish four broad types of government involvement in the economy. First, the government attempts to respond to market failures to allocate resources efficiently. In a particular market, efficiency means that the quantity produced is determined by the intersection of a demand curve that reflects all the benefits of consuming a particular good or service and a supply curve that reflects the opportunity costs of producing it.
Second, government agencies act to encourage or discourage the consumption of certain goods and services. The prohibition of drugs such as heroin and cocaine is an example of government seeking to discourage consumption of these drugs. Third, the government redistributes income through programs such as welfare and Social Security. Fourth, the government can use its spending and tax policies to influence the level of economic activity and the price level. We will examine the first three of these aspects of government involvement in the economy in this chapter.
The fourth, efforts to influence the level of economic activity and the price level, fall within the province of macroeconomics. In an earlier chapter on markets and efficiency, we learned that a market maximizes net benefit by achieving a level of output at which marginal benefit equals marginal cost.
That is the efficient solution. That is not always the case, however. We have studied several situations in which markets are unlikely to achieve efficient solutions. In an earlier chapter, we saw that private markets are likely to produce less than the efficient quantities of public goods such as national defense.
They may produce too much of goods that generate external costs and too little of goods that generate external benefits. In all these cases, it is possible that government intervention will move production levels closer to their efficient quantities.
In the next three sections, we shall review how a government could improve efficiency in the cases of public goods, external costs and benefits, and imperfect competition.
A public good is a good or service for which exclusion is prohibitively costly and for which the marginal cost of adding another consumer is zero. National defense, law enforcement, and generally available knowledge are examples of public goods.
The difficulty posed by a public good is that, once it is produced, it is freely available to everyone. No consumer can be excluded from consumption of the good on grounds that he or she has not paid for it.
Consequently, each consumer has an incentive to be a free rider in consuming the good, and the firms providing a public good do not get a signal from consumers that reflects their benefit of consuming the good.
Certainly we can expect some benefits of a public good to be revealed in the market. If the government did not provide national defense, for example, we would expect some defense to be produced, and some people would contribute to its production.
The theory of public goods is an important argument for government involvement in the economy. Government agencies may either produce public goods themselves, as do local police departments, or pay private firms to produce them, as is the case with many government-sponsored research efforts. An important debate in the provision of public education revolves around the question of whether education should be produced by the government, as is the case with traditional public schools, or purchased by the government, as is done in charter schools.
External costs are imposed when an action by one person or firm harms another, outside of any market exchange. The social cost of producing a good or service equals the private cost plus the external cost of producing it.
In the case of external costs, private costs are less than social costs. Similarly, external benefits are created when an action by one person or firm benefits another, outside of any market exchange. The social benefit of an activity equals the private benefit revealed in the market plus external benefits. When an activity creates external benefits, its social benefit will be greater than its private benefit.
The lack of a market transaction means that the person or firm responsible for the external cost or benefit does not face the full cost or benefit of the choice involved.
We expect markets to produce more than the efficient quantity of goods or services that generate external costs and less than the efficient quantity of goods or services that generate external benefits.
Consider the case of firms that produce memory chips for computers. The production of these chips generates water pollution. The cost of this pollution is an external cost; the firms that generate it do not face it.
These firms thus face some, but not all, of the costs of their production choices. We can expect the market price of chips to be lower, and the quantity produced greater, than the efficient level. Inoculations against infectious diseases create external benefits. A person getting a flu shot, for example, receives private benefits; he or she is less likely to get the flu.
But there will be external benefits as well: Other people will also be less likely to get the flu because the person getting the shot is less likely to have the flu. Because this latter benefit is external, the social benefit of flu shots exceeds the private benefit, and the market is likely to produce less than the efficient quantity of flu shots.
Market Failure and the Role of Government
Government interventions in a private market economy are intended to correct so-called market failures or to achieve a societal objective. We focus here on government interventions to correct private market failures. Market failures Instances in which the private market fails to allocate societal resources in the most economically efficient manner. A key type of market failure that government tries to address in regulations and laws are externalities. Government policies are also used to address societal concerns that are associated with private market economies, such as economic inequalities. For sustainable businesses, the most relevant market failures are externalities, and we focus on these as follows.
PDF | There are many questions such as what should be the role of the government in the economy, whether it is successful or failure, what is.
Market Failure and the Role of Government
In neoclassical economics , market failure is a situation in which the allocation of goods and services by a free market is not Pareto efficient , often leading to a net loss of economic value. The existence of a market failure is often the reason that self-regulatory organizations , governments or supra-national institutions intervene in a particular market. However, government policy interventions, such as taxes , subsidies , wage and price controls , and regulations , may also lead to an inefficient allocation of resources, sometimes called government failure.