advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership style pdf

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Autocratic Leadership Style Pdf

File Name: advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership style .zip
Size: 2135Kb
Published: 30.05.2021

Autocratic leadership is very similar to the authoritarian leadership style.

If you have been recently promoted into a leadership role or you have seen your team work less efficiently in recent months, then you may need to learn more about the leadership styles that are most effective in running a company.

This exchange sums up the two sides of the autocratic leadership coin. On the one side is the ability to rally people around a clear and defined vision; and on the other is alienating people by seeming bossy and unnecessarily strict. An effective autocratic leader is one who understands - and carefully treads - this balance, in order to get the most from their team. And if that introduction makes the autocratic style sound a bit intense, check out our amazing examples of leadership to see a real life example.

Autocratic Style leadership | Meaning | Advantages | Disadvantage

An autocratic leadership style is similar to an authoritarian leadership style. Autocratic leaders rely on specific rules, policies, and procedures to govern all processes within the workplace.

To be effective, the leader must be able to have proven competencies in their field, as they are responsible for making most of the decisions in the workplace. Instead of there being a democratic process for teams, there are no group positions of leadership with the autocratic style.

Everything rests with the leader. That means all creative decisions originate from the leader. Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages to consider with the autocratic leadership style. When there is an autocratic leadership established within an organization, there are fewer levels of administration that must be kept informed of each decision.

There is also less feedback from various levels of management which must be processed. That is because there is one person and they are in charge of all arrangements.

This improves the speed of decisions because only one person is weighing the pros and cons of each choice, not a C-Suite. When there are multiple levels of leadership within an organization, a command from the top becomes like a childhood game of Telephone. Each level of management can inadvertently or purposely put their own spin on the communication come from the leadership. By the time the information reaches the front-line employees doing most of the work, the entire original message could be lost.

Autocratic leadership eliminates this issue because the command goes straight to the workers involved. Because autocratic leaders are able to move information throughout an organization quickly, there are fewer delays in productivity.

Workers are less likely to stop their projects or ask for later deadlines because they receive timely decisions and communication from their leadership. That creates a positive impact on the work environment, which leads to more accurate work and consistent production. Autocratic leaders are able to handle a crisis situation easily because they are the ones who are in charge. If there is a short-term problem, the expertise of the leader can be used to create a solution.

For long-term issues, the autocratic leader can direct traffic in specific ways with more efficiency than a C-Suite, creating solutions that can quickly move an organization out of a troublesome state. Although an autocratic leader can have a challenging personality, most employees prefer to work in an environment where there are clear expectations set for them. At the end of the day, the autocratic leader is like the captain of a ship: every decision is a weight on their shoulders and they are ultimately responsible for what happens.

When this happens, productivity levels tend to decrease over time instead of increase. Autocratic leaders are in charge and they make this fact known.

They get to take all the credit for the work that gets done. That means workers tend to not take ownership of the work they do because there is no incentive to do so. Over time, this makes employee morale begin to sink. It also creates hardships for the leader because they may get blamed for the actions of a worker when that worker was told to do something completely different. When an autocratic leader is consistent with their ethics and is determined to create a fair working environment, then there can be a lot of positives for workers in a company.

If the leader offers questionable ethics, however, and refuses to create fairness, then there is no one who can really hold that person accountable.

The work culture is based solely on the ethics and morality of the leader, which means a poor working environment is not likely to change. Workers are forced to rely on the autocratic leader for all their feedback, instructions, and work duties. If they face a decision in the work they are doing, they are almost forced to go to the leader for advice on what to do instead of making the decision on their own.

That makes it almost impossible for leaders to leave the workplace, as workers can become so dependent on their decision-making abilities that nothing gets done if the leader is not present for some reason. What leads to a successful working relationship is an ability of workers to have trust in their leaders, and vice-versa.

The foundation of the autocratic leadership style is one built on mistrust. Leaders must assume that their workers are not performing as they should, which requires their direct supervision to ensure results happen. These types of interactions do not create a sustainable working relationship, which ultimately creates productivity problems as workers experience lower morale levels.

The advantages and disadvantages of the autocratic leadership style show that it can be effective when an organization requires quick, accurate decisions from an experienced leader. It is an easy way to cut through administrative red tape to ensure better communication to all workers.

Over time, however, this leadership style creates mistrust within the workplace. Workers become dependent on someone else to make decisions. That reduces the productivity available, and eventually leads to declining morale. List of the Advantages of Autocratic Leadership 1. It allows for fast decisions to be made. It improves overall communication.

It improves productivity. It handles crisis situations effectively. It reduces employee stress. It counters team inexperience. List of the Disadvantages of Autocratic Leadership 1. It often leads to micromanagement. It does not offer a sense of professional ownership. It creates a work culture based on the leader. It creates a system of dependence. It creates a lack of trust. Share Pin Tweet.

Leadership Styles: 9 Different Leadership Styles (With Advantages and Disadvantages)

Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. Like other leadership styles, the autocratic style has both some benefits and some weaknesses. While those who rely on this approach to heavily are often seen as bossy or dictator-like, this level of control can have benefits and be useful in certain situations. When and where the authoritarian style is most useful can depend on factors such as the situation , the type of task the group is working on, and characteristics of the team members. If you tend to utilize this type of leadership with a group, learning more about your style and the situations in which this style is the most effective can be helpful.

An autocratic leadership style is similar to an authoritarian leadership style. Autocratic leaders rely on specific rules, policies, and procedures to govern all processes within the workplace. To be effective, the leader must be able to have proven competencies in their field, as they are responsible for making most of the decisions in the workplace. Instead of there being a democratic process for teams, there are no group positions of leadership with the autocratic style. Everything rests with the leader. That means all creative decisions originate from the leader. Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages to consider with the autocratic leadership style.


Image: Autocratic style leadership | mean | | Advantages The autocratic style of leadership is also known as a 'leader-centric style' or 'authoritarian style'.


Autocratic Leadership and Democratic Leadership: Benefits and Disadvantages

After having read lots of stuff about participative management and its implementation, lots of questions arise in the mind of the reader. Is participative management really beneficial? What are the pros and cons? What are the challenges involved in implementation?

Under this style, leader concentrates all authority in himself, instructs subordinates as to what to do, when to do it; how to do it, etc. He also exercises close supervision and control over his subordinates. Subordinates are expected to do what they are told. The autocratic leader accomplishes the results through the use of authority, fear of deprivation, punishment and such other negative rewards.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Participative Management

3 comments

Albretch C.

List of the Advantages of the Autocratic Leadership Style · 1. The autocratic style provides fast crisis management benefits. · 2. Decisions can be made faster with​.

REPLY

Imogen B.

Keto cookbook free download pdf introduction to financial and management accounting pdf

REPLY

Whesubstolllin

List of the Advantages of Autocratic Leadership. It allows for fast decisions to be made. It improves overall communication. It improves productivity. It handles crisis situations effectively. It reduces employee stress. It counters team inexperience. It often leads to micromanagement.

REPLY

Leave a comment

it’s easy to post a comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>